Guidelines for Reviewers: Evaluation of Research Articles and Books for UniqDelve Publications
Thank you for your commitment to the peer-review process at UniqDelve Publications. Your expertise and thoughtful evaluation are crucial to maintaining the high quality and integrity of the research articles and books we publish. Please adhere to the following guidelines when reviewing submissions.
Reviewing Research Articles:
- Confidentiality: Treat all manuscripts as confidential documents. Do not discuss, reproduce, or share information from the manuscript without explicit permission.
- Timeliness: Promptly inform the editorial team if you are unable to meet the assigned review deadline. Timely reviews are essential for maintaining an efficient publication process.
- Constructive Feedback: Provide constructive and detailed feedback to help authors improve the quality of their work. Offer specific comments on methodology, results, and interpretation.
- Ethical Considerations: Identify any ethical concerns, such as plagiarism, data fabrication, or conflicts of interest. Report any potential ethical issues to the editorial team.
- Recommendation: Clearly state your recommendation for acceptance, revision, or rejection. Provide a justification for your decision based on the manuscript’s merits.
- Citations: If relevant, suggest additional literature or references that may enhance the manuscript’s scholarly context.
- Reviewer Comments: Include a separate section in your review for confidential comments to the editorial team. Provide insights into the manuscript’s strengths and weaknesses.
Reviewing Book Proposals and Manuscripts:
- Confidentiality: Maintain confidentiality when reviewing book proposals and manuscripts. Avoid discussing or sharing information about the work without explicit permission.
- Scope Evaluation: Evaluate the book proposal or manuscript in terms of its originality, contribution to the field, and alignment with the focus of UniqDelve Publications.
- Constructive Feedback: Offer constructive feedback on the organization, structure, and clarity of the book. Provide suggestions for improvement while highlighting the manuscript’s strengths.
- Ethical Considerations: Identify any ethical concerns related to the book, including issues such as plagiarism or conflicts of interest. Report any potential ethical issues to the editorial team.
- Recommendation: Clearly state your recommendation for acceptance, revision, or rejection. Provide a rationale for your decision based on the book’s academic significance.
- Reviewer Comments: Include a separate section in your review for confidential comments to the editorial team. Provide insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the book proposal or manuscript.
If you have any questions or need clarification during the review process, please contact our editorial team at reviewer.uniqdelve@gmail.com.
Thank you for your dedication to advancing scholarly knowledge through the peer-review process at UniqDelve Publications.
UniqDelve Publications
www.uniqdelve.com